On the Gaza fence, a call for stability — not vengeance

The latest round of deadly violence in Gaza has already taken the lives of at least 34 Palestinians, including eight children. Meanwhile, in Israel’s southern towns, residents want stability — not more war.

Palestinians survey the destruction following an Israeli air strike, in Khan Younis in the southern Gaza Strip, November 14, 2019. (Abed Rahim Khatib/Flash90)
Palestinians survey the destruction following an Israeli air strike, in Khan Younis in the southern Gaza Strip, November 14, 2019. (Abed Rahim Khatib/Flash90)

Israelis in the southern towns of Sderot, Ashdod, and Ashkelon are no longer interested in vengeance. Perhaps it’s their weariness and desperation, or the fact that Benjamin Netanyahu ordered — for transparently political reasons — the targeted assassination that started the latest round of violence. Whatever the reason, there were almost no calls for the army to take over Gaza and kill as many Palestinians as possible. Rather, stability seems to be the goal.

Between the sirens and running to the bomb shelters, local residents told +972 they wanted a resolution to the conflict. Some tried to silence one resident who made racist statements about Muslims to a journalist from a foreign news outlet. With each new round of violence, it seems that more people in Israel, and particularly in the south, clearly see that there is no military solution to the situation in Gaza.

Benny Gantz, the Blue and White party leader, provided one illustration of this change in attitude when he was a guest on a morning television show on Wednesday. The man who once boasted about how many people he killed in Gaza has modified his tone; now he speaks about the need for a long-term solution that is not only military. “We need to make it possible for the two sides to be good neighbors,” the former army chief of staff said. “There must be deterrence, but if there is an opportunity for us to come to a mutual understanding based on economic development and good neighborly relations, then we should take it.”

Far from the sirens in the south, Israeli political leaders in the television studios were suddenly talking about Hamas as though it were the responsible adult in Gaza, demanding that it enforce the ceasefire that has largely held since the last flare-up in May. Meanwhile, the government is not willing to speak directly with Hamas and continues to enforce the 13-year blockade, which is the primary cause of Gaza’s dire living conditions.

One year ago, on November 13, 2018, Mahmoud Abdul-Hamid Abu Asba, a resident of the West Bank town of Halhoul, was killed in his bed when a rocket hit his building in an impoverished area of south Ashkelon. Even if he had had time to get out of bed, he would have had nowhere to run — because there is no bomb shelter in or near his building.

A year later, the situation remains almost completely unchanged. The buildings do not have any bomb shelters or reinforced rooms, and the few shelters in the neighborhood cannot be reached in the 30 or 40 seconds that elapse between a warning siren and an incoming rocket’s impact.

Dozens of people are crammed in shelter 302 on Rabbi Maimon Street in Ashkelon. Some of them are asylum seekers from Sudan who said they lacked mattresses, food, and supplies for the children. The donations that big corporations boast of making to residents of the south do not reach this place. One woman from the area brings food and water for the whole group, paying for the supplies from her own pocket. “They forced us to stay in the shelter. We are just asking for our rights, nothing more,” said another neighborhood woman.

An unopposed military strategy

The past two days have provided a reminder that, besides the Palestinian leadership, there is no political opposition to military operations in Israel. Nitzan Horowitz (Meretz) made some strongly-worded statements about Netanyahu having timed the operation in order to torpedo any possibility of the center-left parties forming a governing coalition, but he did not voice any opposition to the targeted assassination.

Flames rise fire at a factory in Sderot, caused by rocket fired from the Gaza Strip, November 12, 2019. (Noam Revkin Fenton/Flash90)
Flames rise fire at a factory in Sderot, caused by rocket fired from the Gaza Strip, November 12, 2019. (Noam Revkin Fenton/Flash90)

It is easy for Israelis to forget that a targeted assassination is in fact an extrajudicial killing, which in this case took the life of a family member — al-Ata’s wife, who was sleeping beside him. Only rarely does Meretz question the attacks on Gaza. The Joint List and leftist activists are the only real voices of opposition to the attacks on Gaza, to the military blockade, and to the targeted assassinations. And anti-war demonstrations have shrunk with each round of violence: this week, a mere 100 demonstrators gathered in the middle of Tel Aviv on the first day of the military operation.

A ceasefire was announced on Thursday. So far it is holding, with Israel already claiming its military operation was a success — even though the center of the country was paralyzed for hours on Tuesday. Schools and many public services shut under home front orders, creating a sense of emergency that could well serve Netanyahu as he looks increasingly desperate to form a unity government with Gantz.

As usual, the price for this round of violence was paid by the Palestinians in Gaza. At least 34 people were killed and 109 seriously wounded between Tuesday morning and the implementation of a ceasefire on Thursday. Among the dead are eight children and three women. It’s not clear how many of the men were connected to Islamic Jihad, and how many were killed in their homes rather than while involved in any military activity.

On Wednesday, hours before the ceasefire took effect, the army attempted another targeted assassination. This one killed eight members of the same family while they were sleeping. Five of the dead were children. The army said that the father, Rasmi Abu Malhous, was “a commander in a rocket unit”; later, however, it admitted it had bombed the wrong building. Also on Wednesday, a resident of Gaza was killed together with his two children, aged seven and 24, when they came out to greet him as he returned home on his motorcycle.

As Israel enthusiastically resumes its policy of carrying out targeted assassinations, Meretz MK Mossi Raz reminded us that exactly six years ago, on November 14, 2012, Hamas Chief of Staff Ahmad Jabari was assassinated. At the time, the government promised that “Israeli citizens would no longer have to sit in bomb shelters.”

A version of this article was originally published in Hebrew on Local Call. Read it here.

20 responses to “On the Gaza fence, a call for stability — not vengeance”

  1. Lewis from Afula says:

    Stability will only be achieved when the Gazans are mass expelled to Egypt.
    Its the only solution, we have NOT yet tried.

    • Bruce Gould says:

      Here’s one solution that hasn’t been tried:

      “Consider the proposal of Uri Elitzur, a founder of the Jewish fundamentalist movement Gush Emunim…In 2009…Elitzur proposed a detailed article insisting that the ‘taboo’ on discussion of the only real solution to the problem – annexation, with full citizenship for Arab inhabitants – had to be broken. Looking 30 years ahead, Elitzur argued that the only alternative would be two states, which would mean endless bloodshed or a continuation of the status quo that – as a permanent arrangement – would be apartheid…He saw these [formulas proposed by the right] as doomed attempts to camouflage the reality of masses of people living under Israeli rule but without Israeli citizenship. What would happen to such an apartheid state, he wrote, ‘is what happened to South Africa’. ”

      – page 147, “Paradigm Lost: From Two State Solution To One State Reality”, Ian Lustick

      • Ben says:

        A proposal that an unreconstructed Hardali-Kookist like ‘Itshak Gordine’ would do well to consider. The marginal neo-Kookism of someone like Itshak is in my view cold racist hyper-nationalism dressed up as something spiritual and higher. Elitzur of Gush Emunim here offers him a way out of this trap.

      • Lewis from Afula says:

        Bruce – that was tried during the British Mandate period.
        It FAILED back then too !

    • duh says:

      On the contrary, you’ve tried that solution again and again. It’s why there’s a conflict in the first place.

  2. Joel says:

    “It is easy for Israelis to forget that a targeted assassination is in fact an extrajudicial killing”.

    If this was a criminal matter, the above might be true. This is a military matter. A war. I have yet to hear of a country that brings enemy soldiers to a trial before shooting at them.

    • Carmen says:

      @Joel – The Palestinians have no army. The people routinely killed by the PAB (IOF) routinely are civilians. War crimes. Crimes against humanity. But really, you already know all that.

      • Lewis from Afula says:

        The fakestinyans don’t have a
        royal palace
        archeological record

        That is because they never existed and never will !

      • Itshak Gordine says:

        Hamas and Islamic Jihad are terrorist organizations that have powerful weapons from Iran that they use against the Israeli population. The Jihad commander who was neutralized was behind numerous attacks against Israeli civilians. And he was preparing others.

        • Ben says:

          Itshak Gordine you LOVE Islamic Jihad. They, and the pseudo-withdrawal from Gaza Israel crafted, are the distraction, the disguise that let’s you claim victimhood while you rape the Palestinians to the East in the West Bank. (Ariel Sharon and his henchman Dore Gold said this same thing in so many words, as you know; Gold using the word “formaldehyde” about the peace process.) Islamic Jihad and your grievance and victimhood tax you collect from them is like the Little Red Riding Hood costume you wear while you go after Grandma in her house in the occupied territories and have your way with her. (Remember how that story ends, however, for the Wolf.)

          Itshak, you really oughtta look at Gush Emunim’s Uri Elitzur’s advice on this page (posted by Bruce). It is the face-saving, sane way out of your obdurate Hardali neo-Kookist dilemma, a defunct, neo-fascist recidivist trap of your own making.

          • Itshak Gordine says:

            Still your delusions and blah blah , Ben? Islamic Jihad is a danger to our people. They sent missiles at the name of Allah on our civilians and we had to call them to order.

          • Ben says:

            I see Itshak has absolutely no argument, gives a strikingly impoverished and evasive reply, and is afraid to even touch the issues I raise. This is telling.

          • Itshak Gordine says:

            You write nonsense and when you are proven that you are wrong, as usual, you claim that we have no argument. Hamas and Islamic Jihad are organizations recognized as terrorists by a majority of free states. These criminal organizations advocate the destruction of Israel and threaten its population with missiles. So Hamas and Islamic Jihad must be fought without mercy until they give up terrorism.

          • Ben says:

            I see, again, that Itshak has absolutely no argument, again gives a strikingly impoverished and evasive reply, and is afraid to even touch the issues I raise. This, again, is telling.

      • joel says:

        It’s an asymmetric war, but a war nonetheless. The “extrajudicial killing” referred to in the article is that of Baha Abu al-Ata, who was the leader of a militant movement that shot missiles at Israel. Not exactly a “civilian”.